LET’S TALK
/ /
services
how we work
about
/
/
SEE HOW WE WORK
LET'S TALK
Original sample written by Security Flair to demonstrate our work. Not client work.
// MESSAGING
From "intelligent platform" to a headline buyers understand
Most security homepages fail the same test. A CISO lands on the page, reads the headline, and still can't tell you what the product does.

Here's a made-up example. Say you sell a cloud permissions tool called Keyward. It shows what access each identity has, compares that with what it actually uses, flags access that looks unused, and exports the findings so engineering can fix them. Solid product. Here's the headline it launched with:

"An intelligent cloud permissions platform with unified visibility, advanced analytics and actionable insights."

Now try to answer three questions from that sentence. What will I see if I click? Who is it for? What do I do with the output? You can't. Every word in it could describe forty other products, and "intelligent" is doing a lot of work with nothing behind it.
The rewrite
Headline: See which cloud permissions nobody's using.

Supporting copy: Compare what each identity can do with what it actually does, flag access worth a second look, and hand engineering a list they can act on.

Button: See a sample finding
Why it works
  • The headline names a task, not a category. A security lead knows in two seconds whether that's their problem.
  • Every claim maps to something the product actually does. No "reduce risk by 80%" unless there's data to back it.
  • The button promises something specific. If someone clicks and lands on a generic demo form, you've lost them. So the next page has to actually show a sample finding.
One deliberate word choice: the copy says "flag," not "remove." Unused access isn't always safe to delete. Break-glass roles and quarterly jobs look idle right up until you need them. Security buyers notice when a vendor pretends otherwise.
Same message, three places
Once the headline works, everything else gets easier. Here's the same message as a cold email and a LinkedIn post from the founder.
Cold email

Subject: unused cloud permissions
Hi Sam,

Quick question: when your team runs access reviews in AWS, how do you tell which permissions are actually being used?

Most teams we talk to compare IAM policies against CloudTrail by hand. Usually in a spreadsheet. Usually the week before an audit.

Keyward puts both side by side, flags access nobody has touched in 90 days, and exports it as a list engineering can work through.

Worth 20 minutes to see a sample finding?

Alex
LinkedIn post
Every access review I've sat in goes the same way.

Someone exports the IAM policies. Someone else pulls CloudTrail. Two days later there's a spreadsheet with 4,000 rows and a meeting where everyone agrees "we should really clean this up."

Then nothing happens, because nobody wants to be the person who removes access and breaks production.

The fix isn't more data. It's a shorter list. Show me the 30 permissions nobody has used in 90 days, tell me who owns them, and let me send that to engineering as a ticket.

That's the whole idea behind Keyward.
What this shows
Same claim in three places, at three lengths. Nothing in the email promises something the homepage doesn't, and nothing in the post invents a stat. For a buyer who has never heard of you, that consistency is most of what trust looks like.

*Keyward, Sam and Alex are fictional, created for this sample.

Let’s talk about your cybersecurity product

/ /⠀GET IN TOUCH
Leave your details and we’ll follow up to discuss your priorities and how Security Flair can help.
We'll use your details to respond to your inquiry. See our Privacy Policy